3/19/2023 0 Comments Hold the line trumpYet, that report made no mention of DOJ sources. The far-right, including an editor at large at Breitbart News, immediately cried “foul” about The Washington Post’s scoop and claimed that someone at Justice must be leaking. The New York Times weighed in with further confirmation. That report was quickly followed by reporting from NBC News that essentially corroborated the DOJ’s interest in Trump. The reporting began Tuesday night with The Washington Post’s news that the DOJ had called at least two high-ranking aides to Vice President Mike Pence into a grand jury and questioned them for hours about Trump’s actions related to the alternate electors scheme. Garland’s careful approach contrasted with the crashing wave of reporting that soon drowned out his quiet comments. People demanding immediate action from Garland can be forgiven if they’ve forgotten how justice and the rule of law are supposed to be executed. That’s how the Justice Department is supposed to work – it’s not supposed to leak. That may be frustrating for some people, especially those who believed that if there were an investigation, that we would have already seen leaks indicating an investigation. We have an attorney general who won’t call a press conference to tell us his opinion about investigative findings - or even to tell us that an investigation exists. Now, we have a Justice Department that’s back to methodically focusing on facts. And, they saw that same lackey attorney general mislead the public about the perceived perils of mail-in balloting. They saw that same attorney general appoint special counsel John Durham to try to destroy the original investigation into Russian interference with Trump’s campaign - even after the DOJ’s own inspector general determined the case was properly predicated. After all, those people saw one of Trump’s attorneys general, William Barr, shamelessly jump in front of the release of the Mueller Special Counsel Report with his own press conference that included a fabrication-filled four-page summary. The many people demanding immediate action from Garland can be forgiven if they’ve forgotten how justice and the rule of law are supposed to be executed. The department is supposed to follow the facts and the law – not the op-ed pages. That’s not how a healthy Justice Department is supposed to do things. But Garland wasn’t going to cave to public pressure. Capitol began expressing their own frustration with him. The pressure on Garland to move faster, say something, arrest somebody, anybody, close to Trump intensified when some members of the House committee investigating the Jan. Since Trump left office, many have demanded swift justice for the man they hold responsible for assaulting our democracy. It’s been so long since we had a by-the-book attorney general that many Americans still don’t quite understand if they’re supposed to be encouraged or disappointed by what they heard from Garland Tuesday evening. Prosecutors and media outlets play different roles and move at different speeds as both seek to ferret out the truth. While Tuesday night may have been confounding to some, for me, it was an example of how things are supposed to work.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |